Bogdanov thesis reports

Present knowledge is unable to determine what happened during the Planck era, and the Bogdanov publications purported to have discovered what happened during this earliest epoch, and even before the moment of the singularity itself. They each studied applied mathematics in Paris, but then began careers in television, hosting several popular programs on science and science fiction. And Man Created the Universe.

Bogdanov thesis reports

Present knowledge is unable to determine what happened during the Planck era, and the Bogdanov publications purported to have discovered what happened during this earliest epoch, and even before the moment of the singularity itself.

And Man Created the Universe. After a legal battle in France, Thuan and the Bogdanovs settled out of court, and the Bogdanovs later denied all wrongdoing.

Thuan suggests that the plagiarism suit pressed the brothers to obtain doctorates as fast as possible, since according to Thuan the back cover of the book claimed that the Bogdanovs held doctorates when they did not.

Proofreading essay free - AIR

According to Sternheimer, the twins viewed themselves as "the Einstein brothers" and had a propensity to voice vague, "impressionistic" statements; he considered guiding their efforts "like teaching My Fair Lady to speak with an Oxford accent. Inafter publishing the requisite articles, Igor was given a Ph.

They have the right to have their work recognized with a diploma, which is nothing much these days. The Bogdanovs quickly became a popular discussion topic, with most respondents agreeing that the papers were flawed.

Overbye writes Jackiw was intrigued by the thesis, although it contained many points he did not understand. Jackiw defended the thesis: All these were ideas that could possibly make sense. It showed some originality and some familiarity with the jargon.

Alas, I was completely mistaken. The scientific language was just an appearance behind which hid incompetence and ignorance of even basic physics. With revisions I expect the paper to be suitable for publication.

However, after the publication of the article and the publicity surrounding the controversy, mathematician Greg Kuperberg posted to Usenet a statement written by Andrew Wray and Hermann Nicolai of the CQG editorial board. The paper was discussed extensively at the annual Editorial Board meeting Since then several steps have been taken to further improve the peer review process in order to improve the quality assessment on articles submitted to the journal and reduce the likelihood that this could happen again.

In particular the sentences " I recommend the paper for publication but in a revised form. The report stated that "the viewpoint presented in this paper can be interesting as a possible approach of the Planck scale physics. In conclusion, I would not recommend that this paper be published in this, or any, journal.

For example, John C. Baez stated that the Bogdanov papers are "a mishmash of superficially plausible sentences containing the right buzzwords in approximately the right order.

There is no logic or cohesion in what they write. He continued, "But the increasingly low standard of coherence in the whole field is what allowed them to think they were doing something sensible and to get it published.

The Bogdanovs explained that these claims would only be clear in the context of topological field theory. Since the big bang happened everywhereno matter which way a pendulum swings, the plane in which it swings can be said to "intersect the big bang".

However, Baez pointed out, this statement does not in fact concern the Big Bang, and is entirely equivalent to the following: No matter which way a pendulum swings, there is some point on the plane in which it swings.

Yet this rephrasing is itself equivalent to the statement Any plane contains a point.

Bogdanov thesis reports

If this was the essence of the statement, Baez noted, it cannot be very useful in "explaining the origin of inertia ".Definitions of Bogdanov_Affair, synonyms, antonyms, derivatives of Bogdanov_Affair, analogical dictionary of Bogdanov_Affair (English).

The Bogdanov Affair is an academic dispute regarding the legitimacy of a series of theoretical physics papers written by French twins Igor and Grichka Bogdanov (alternately spelt Bogdanoff).These papers were published in reputable scientific journals, and were alleged by their authors to culminate in a proposed theory for describing what occurred at the Big Bang.

The Bogdanov affair is an academic dispute regarding the legitimacy of a series of theoretical physics papers written by French twins Igor and Grichka Bogdanov Reports and comments from scientists Thesis readers.

One of the scientists who approved Igor Bogdanov's thesis, MIT's Roman Jackiw.

The Bogdanoff Affair

The Bogdanov Affair is an academic dispute regarding the legitimacy of a series of theoretical physics papers written by French twins Igor and Grichka One of the scientists who approved Igor Bogdanov's thesis, MIT's Roman Jackiw, the reports on the Bogdanov theses and most of the journal referees' reports spoke favorably of their work.

Bogdanov Thesis Reports Posted on June 11, by woit From one of the comments here I see that the Bogdanovs have put the reports on their theses on the CERN document server. If you give me a private email (you can contact me at [email protected]) I can send you the copies of the thesis reports: you will see that the Honorable mention is present on Grichka's but not on mine.

This is a fact and one cannot deny it.

Talk:Bogdanov affair/Archive 5 - Wikipedia